The science guy debates the creation man

Bill Nye
media photo provided at his website

I was one of thousands who watched last evening’s debate between Bill Nye, the Science Guy, and Ken Ham, the creation man.

Nye wore a snazzy bow tie and a natty suit that looked tailored. Ham’s suit and tie appeared to be off a department store rack. Nye’s chiseled features contrasted with Ham’s rugged Aussie visage. Nye was a polished speaker with an articulate and pleasant presentation. Ham had a more serious demeanor and sometimes stumbled over words.

But despite external appearances, the more significant internal differences were obvious. Ham clearly has hope, and Nye does not.

Even before the debate, controversy erupted. Secularists criticized Nye for accepting the invitation. Many of them believed entering into a debate added legitimacy to the pseudo-science of creationism. Creationists criticized Ham for “casting pearls” in a debate with someone who would not be swayed by biblical arguments. Theistic evolutionists decried both men as radicals advocating extreme positions.

The debate focused on the question: “Is creation a viable model of origins in today’s modern scientific era?”

Bill Nye was invited to discuss this question with Ken Ham because on the “big think” website he urged parents not to live in their own little world and teach their children that God created the cosmos:

I say to the grownups, if you want to deny evolution and live in your world, in your world that’s completely inconsistent with everything we observe in the universe, that’s fine, but don’t make your kids do it because we need them. We need scientifically literate voters and taxpayers for the future. We need people that can — we need engineers that can build stuff, solve problems.

You can watch a video of Nye’s remarks here.

Last night’s debate showcased both men’s passion about their beliefs. Ham believes adults should teach children the truth about creation from God’s Word. Nye believes teaching creationism jeopardizes the future of the United States as a world leader in technology. The two men don’t agree on basic definitions of science because they have two radically different worldviews.

Those worldviews were so obvious during the debate that it was as if they each stood on the brink of a cliff with a gaping chasm between them. At the debate’s conclusion, it was almost a shock to see them cross to each other and shake hands instead of plunging into the separating abyss.

You can watch the debate for yourself over at the Answers in Genesis website. Albert Mohler, who was present in person, presents an accurate assessment of the debate here.


6 thoughts on “The science guy debates the creation man

  1. Appreciated your comments. I personally have not yet watched the debate, but have read many comments from folks who have, and it just seems like there has been a lot of anger coming from Theists and Naturalists alike. Looking forward to watching it, possibly sometime today! -Ernie

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s