URCNA Synod 2012-10: Missions

The URCNA has suffered from a lack of coordinated efforts in missions and church planting efforts and Synod London 2010 set up a study committee to research and make recommendations regarding a permanent missions committee and coordinator options. The study committee’s report recommended the establishment of a permanent committee, representing all classes, and a full-time missions coordinator.

The vote of the first two recommendations from the advisory committee demonstrated the unity of thought with regard to the need for a coordinated mission effort. Delegates quickly passed motions to establish a Missions Committee and to allow the Missions Study Committee to serve as the new standing committee in an interim capacity, but things slowed to a crawl when it came to appointing a Missions Coordinator.

Many delegates expressed concern about the expense of a full-time director and suggested that other less costly methods might be employed. There were also concerns about the local consistory losing its authority on some mission-related issues.

Several missionaries and church planters related how they’ve received crucial assistance from denominationally appointed personnel from other federations, and spoke with feeling of their longing for this type of support within their own federation.

Among those speaking was Rev. Andre Ferrari, a church planter in Milan, Italy. He explained that a group of believers from Romania contacted him because of “the principled ecclesiology” of the URCNA.

“So we are walking with them,” he said, adding that he didn’t know how that could continue due to his already full load as a pastor. “The best men during the Protestant Reformation functioned as members of a virtual missions committee.”

Speaking in favor of the motion, Rev. Chris Folkerts asked delegates not to focus so much on practicality, but rather to think in terms of biblical stewardship. He said, “Paul was the quintessential missions coordinator.”

Sometimes a lengthy debate concludes with a surprising vote. When the question was finally called, a large majority of delegates approved hiring a Missions Coordinator.

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “URCNA Synod 2012-10: Missions

  1. I think this is good news. I give to some missionary causes but they are not Reformed. I have wanted to shift some of that giving to Reformed, church-oriented works. I think the URCNA getting better organized in this way will help me do that. It will be hard to pull back from the things I have been supporting (due to some old friendships), but there are a lot of evangelicals to support evangelical causes and not nearly as many conservative Reformed people to support Reformed causes.

  2. Not only Reformed, but biblical in the sense of churches planting churches and not para-church efforts.As useful as these can be, they cannot take the place of the former. A great day for URCNA!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s